Background:
During the Spring of 2005, the UN Commission on Human Rights passed a resolution designating Yozo Yokota and Chin-Sung Chung to undertake a 3 year study in collaboration with various organs of the UN including the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, xenophobia and Related Intolerance; the ILO and Unesco. Dalit activists praised that, unlike previous attempts, the Indian government did not block the passing of the resolution nor its adoption. The study published its final findings in 2009 containing a set of draft principles and guidelines in order to properly work on the social inequality.
Policy:
The United Kingdom has taken large leaps and bounds towards social equality in recent years. In addition to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1979, the UK has taken its own steps to combat the issue of discrimination.The Convention defines discrimination against women as "...any distinction, exclusion or restriction made on the basis of sex which has the effect or purpose of impairing or nullifying the recognition, enjoyment or exercise by women, irrespective of their marital status, on a basis of equality of men and women, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural, civil or any other field." During the last reporting period, 2008-2013, the United Kingdom Government’s equality policy has yielded only partial results. Many of the crucial issues raised by the CEDAW Committee in the 2008 examination remain unmet and there has been regression in some key areas. Key issues raised in the UK include:The lack of implementation of a gender-sensitive framework of equality and non-discrimination
in the UK continues to impact negatively on women’s lives. The material effects of this include:
• the continued failure to address the high level of violence against women and girls and the embedded causes of this, and to sustainably fund specialist dedicated women-only services for these women
the reduction in legal support and access to justice for women suffering discrimination and violence
• welfare reforms which are pushing more women into poverty and insecurity
• the inadequacies of healthcare support and provision for women
• the incomplete support for women with ‘no recourse to public funds’ and refugee and asylum seeking women.
Possible Solutions:
The UK has performed self-assessments with cooperation from organizations such as the Fawcett Society in order to properly recognize weaknesses of our approaches. The UK would like to bring to the attention of SOCHUM the particularities of our strategies in relation to combatting social gender inequality worldwide. Suggestions include:
-
A gender equality impact assessment of the programme of public funding cuts should be carried out alongside an assessment of economic strategy from a gender equality perspective
-
Develop a common model of analysis, for national and local government, and public bodies, to predict the likely equality effects of policy including gender responsive budgeting
-
Ensure that policies and mechanisms, especially those of the Human Rights Act, put into place are able to remain in force despite the negative rhetoric shrouding human rights
-
Take measures to mitigate the disproportionate effect of education cuts on women and to mainstream gender equality curricula across all levels of education
Works Cited
"CEDAW 29th Session 30 June to 25 July 2003." UN News Center. UN, n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2013.
"Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women." UN News Center. UN, n.d. Web. 06 Dec. 2013.
"UN Study on Discrimination Based on Work and Descent." International Dalit Solidarity Network: Sub-Commission Reports. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Dec. 2013.
"Women's Equality in the UK." The Fawcett Society Womens Equality in the UK Comments. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Dec. 2013.
- - -
Background:
The United Nations' human rights committee has unanimously condemned the "systematic, widespread and grave" human rights abuses in North Korea, citing its reported use of torture, the death penalty for political and religious reasons and numerous political prison camps. North Korean diplomat Kim Song vehemently rejected the resolution, which was sponsored by the European Union and Japan, saying it was "politically motivated" and promoted by the United States and its followers "in their attempt to achieve their goals of undermining our system". The resolution highlights "inhuman" conditions of detention, public executions, collective punishments extending up to three generations, the extensive use of forced labour, limitations on every person who wants to travel in the country or abroad and severe punishment of refugees or asylum seekers returned to North Korea. The UN Human Rights Council commission of inquiry has heard evidence in London, Tokyo and Seoul and will be in Washington from Wednesday.
The inquiry has heard harrowing stories of labor camps in the isolated state ruled by Kim Jong-Un as well from relatives of Japanese believed abducted by North Korean agents and families divided since the 1950-53 Korean War.
Policy:
The United Kingdom has never been reluctant to investigate North Korea’s obstinate behavior in the national scene. In fact, the British Embassy in Pyongyang, North Korea supports British interests in the DPRK. The embassy’s work concentrates on counter-proliferation and human rights in North Korea. North Korea has been extremely receptive to negotiation and diplomacy with the United Kingdom, going as far as to broadcast the 2002 film Bend It Like Beckham on state television on the 10th anniversary of our relations. The amiable relationship we have has existed since 1966.
Policy:
The United Kingdom, following the establishment of our embassy in North Korea, has persevered in providing English language and human rights training to DPRK officials, as well as going so far as to suggest visits to the UN Special Rapporteur for Human Rights which oversees bilateral humanitarian projects in North Korea. Currently we have no plans to withdraw our presence from DPRK. In fact, the UK would be extremely comfortable in leading diplomatic negotiations on behalf of SOCHUM in order to further the advancement of human rights in DPRK.
Possible Solutions:
The UK would look favorably upon incentivized negotiations with North Korea. In addition, we would be wary on allowing nations with poor relations with DPRK to heavily influence this tactic.
Works Cited
"Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea." Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Dec. 2013.
"Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea." Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Dec. 2013.
"'No Plans to Withdraw' UK Diplomats from North Korea." BBC News. BBC, 04 May 2013. Web. 06 Dec. 2013.
- - -
Background:
When Burma gained independence form Great Britain on January 4th 1948, it was originally institutionalized as a democratic nation. The region, however, had a multitude of ethnic diversities that failed to unify after independence. Overtime, the original democratic government collapsed, replaced by military rule that is similar to the Soviet Russia.
The United Kingdom believes that ethical divisions are a major contributing factor to the violence, with political alignment is derivative factor. There are over three different civil wars that occur on and off sporadically over the last decade. The primary belligerents are Kachin Independence army, the Shan, Lahu, Kareen, and Rohingya. All of which are in conflict with the official government. In addition, the military coup by General Ne Win created a socialist culture among some parts of the population. There were many protests and retaliations against a military government that were quickly suppressed. There have been many attempts to restore a democratic form of government in Burma. Efforts of the National League for Democracy have created a lasting aware of the condition in Burma, and helped create the starting of a possibly new form of democratic government.
Policy:
The United Kingdom has always been advocates for Burmese democracy and human rights in the region. The main organization, which encourages active peacemaking efforts and reform, is the UK sponsored Burma Campaign. The Campaign has a critical role in bringing awareness about the Burmese conflict and attempts to help solve the horrific violations of human rights that occur in the country. The United Kingdom has opened embassies in both the Burma mainland and in conflicting areas to act as a buffer of international support to lessen future conflicts. The British government has also made Burma one of its top priorities in international agenda. The main priorities include:
-
Increasing Business with Burma.
-
Supporting Development in Burma.
-
Supporting Democratic Reform and Good Governance in Burma.
-
Reducing Conflict in Burma.
- Improving Human Rights in Burma.
Institutions such as the Burma Campaign and United Kingdom’s international objectives help Burma in transitioning to a democratic and free nation. The policies have had lasting effects, such as making the Burmese condition aware to the UN Security Council and the SOCHUM.
Possible Solutions:
The United Kingdom believes that more UN intervention and support is necessary to maintaining the fragile government in Burma. In effect a widespread international effort will be needed to insure democratic stability.
-
Have world powers facilitate peace talks between the official government of Burma and the rebel forces and ethnic divisions. An open and honest discussion will help solve misunderstandings to encourage cooperation.
-
Put pressure on the government to keep the nation democratic in nature. If necessary, a UN peacekeeping force may be kept on standby to have a presence of authority to deter any radicalists.
- Establishment of UN sponsored workshops to help educate the public about ethical diversities in the country. Such workshops help foster mutual understanding and trust between factions and ethnicities.
Adequate aid given to Burma of the 30% of citizens who live in poverty because of the conflict. Helping the destitute solve immediate needs facilitate the long-term goal of stability in the region.